17 yrs. no warming?

A forum not related to waterfowl for discussing the more controversial and hot topic issues in our world from immigration, politics, the war, etc..

Moderators: Smackaduck, MM

Re: 17 yrs. no warming?

Postby WoodyWhiffingMG » Wed Jun 19, 2013 6:43 pm

Chilidawg wrote:
Indawoods wrote:great read for those scientifically conversant enough to follow the article, cited sources, links, and comments.

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/06/13/no-significant-warming-for-17-years-4-months/


from global warming to climate change to stasis. lolicopter.


. . . . By Christopher Monckton of Brenchley

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

here is a nice list of some of Monckton's claims that have been debunked.

http://www.skepticalscience.com/Monckton_Myths.htm


Do a search... Skepticalscience.com also backed up the 97% claim which was easily debunked by so many others... So clearly they are a trustworth source :thumbsup:
There are only two types of people in the world, those who love duck hunting and those who never have duck hunted.
User avatar
WoodyWhiffingMG
hunter
 
Posts: 8246
Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2008 9:30 pm
Location: Back in SW MICHIGAN


Re: 17 yrs. no warming?

Postby Chilidawg » Wed Jun 19, 2013 6:47 pm

WoodyWhiffingMG wrote:
And don't you dare say it is a proven scientific fact!


So the fact that it has been demonstrated numerous times in the laboratory has no meaning to you?
Chilidawg
hunter
 
Posts: 257
Joined: Mon May 13, 2013 6:24 am

Re: 17 yrs. no warming?

Postby Chilidawg » Wed Jun 19, 2013 6:49 pm

WoodyWhiffingMG wrote:
Chilidawg wrote:
Indawoods wrote:great read for those scientifically conversant enough to follow the article, cited sources, links, and comments.

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/06/13/no-significant-warming-for-17-years-4-months/


from global warming to climate change to stasis. lolicopter.


. . . . By Christopher Monckton of Brenchley

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

here is a nice list of some of Monckton's claims that have been debunked.

http://www.skepticalscience.com/Monckton_Myths.htm


Do a search... Skepticalscience.com also backed up the 97% claim which was easily debunked by so many others... So clearly they are a trustworth source :thumbsup:


Check out the links.

Every Claim that Monckton has made has been completely debunked.

The man is a clown.
Chilidawg
hunter
 
Posts: 257
Joined: Mon May 13, 2013 6:24 am

Re: 17 yrs. no warming?

Postby WoodyWhiffingMG » Wed Jun 19, 2013 6:54 pm

Chilidawg wrote:
WoodyWhiffingMG wrote:
And don't you dare say it is a proven scientific fact!


So the fact that it has been demonstrated numerous times in the laboratory has no meaning to you?


There are many theories demonstrated in a lab and latter proven wrong, but please provid a source.
I would be interested in reading it.
There are only two types of people in the world, those who love duck hunting and those who never have duck hunted.
User avatar
WoodyWhiffingMG
hunter
 
Posts: 8246
Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2008 9:30 pm
Location: Back in SW MICHIGAN

Re: 17 yrs. no warming?

Postby WoodyWhiffingMG » Wed Jun 19, 2013 6:55 pm

Chilidawg wrote:
WoodyWhiffingMG wrote:
Chilidawg wrote:
Indawoods wrote:great read for those scientifically conversant enough to follow the article, cited sources, links, and comments.

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/06/13/no-significant-warming-for-17-years-4-months/


from global warming to climate change to stasis. lolicopter.


. . . . By Christopher Monckton of Brenchley

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

here is a nice list of some of Monckton's claims that have been debunked.

http://www.skepticalscience.com/Monckton_Myths.htm


Do a search... Skepticalscience.com also backed up the 97% claim which was easily debunked by so many others... So clearly they are a trustworth source :thumbsup:


Check out the links.

Every Claim that Monckton has made has been completely debunked.

The man is a clown.


But your reference is writen by liberal stool pigeons. :thumbsup:

Which has already been proven!
Last edited by WoodyWhiffingMG on Wed Jun 19, 2013 6:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
There are only two types of people in the world, those who love duck hunting and those who never have duck hunted.
User avatar
WoodyWhiffingMG
hunter
 
Posts: 8246
Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2008 9:30 pm
Location: Back in SW MICHIGAN

Re: 17 yrs. no warming?

Postby Chilidawg » Wed Jun 19, 2013 6:56 pm

A point by point debunking of Monckton

http://www.stthomas.edu/engineering/jpabraham/
Chilidawg
hunter
 
Posts: 257
Joined: Mon May 13, 2013 6:24 am

Re: 17 yrs. no warming?

Postby Chilidawg » Wed Jun 19, 2013 6:57 pm

WoodyWhiffingMG wrote:
Chilidawg wrote:
WoodyWhiffingMG wrote:
And don't you dare say it is a proven scientific fact!


So the fact that it has been demonstrated numerous times in the laboratory has no meaning to you?


There are many theories demonstrated in a lab and latter proven wrong, but please provid a source.
I would be interested in reading it.


What theories have been demonstrated in a a lab and later proven to be wrong?

How can you demonstrate something using the scientific method that is wrong?

I don't think you understand how science works.
Chilidawg
hunter
 
Posts: 257
Joined: Mon May 13, 2013 6:24 am

Re: 17 yrs. no warming?

Postby WoodyWhiffingMG » Wed Jun 19, 2013 6:58 pm

Chilidawg wrote:A point by point debunking of Monckton

http://www.stthomas.edu/engineering/jpabraham/


It won't open. :huh:
There are only two types of people in the world, those who love duck hunting and those who never have duck hunted.
User avatar
WoodyWhiffingMG
hunter
 
Posts: 8246
Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2008 9:30 pm
Location: Back in SW MICHIGAN

Re: 17 yrs. no warming?

Postby WoodyWhiffingMG » Wed Jun 19, 2013 7:01 pm

Chilidawg wrote:
WoodyWhiffingMG wrote:
Chilidawg wrote:
WoodyWhiffingMG wrote:
And don't you dare say it is a proven scientific fact!


So the fact that it has been demonstrated numerous times in the laboratory has no meaning to you?


There are many theories demonstrated in a lab and latter proven wrong, but please provid a source.
I would be interested in reading it.


What theories have been demonstrated in a a lab and later proven to be wrong?

How can you demonstrate something using the scientific method that is wrong?

I don't think you understand how science works.


No, I never said ethical and accurate scientific method has been used!

Global warming is a case and point!
They "proved" and later it was debunked, because they fiddled with results to get what they want.

Like I said I would be interested in reading these scientific studies discussing lab proof of evolution. Post em up!
There are only two types of people in the world, those who love duck hunting and those who never have duck hunted.
User avatar
WoodyWhiffingMG
hunter
 
Posts: 8246
Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2008 9:30 pm
Location: Back in SW MICHIGAN

Re: 17 yrs. no warming?

Postby WoodyWhiffingMG » Wed Jun 19, 2013 7:05 pm

If there has been proof why have multiple groups tried to fake the missing link fossils?

Seems like that would be a waste if it was proven :huh:
There are only two types of people in the world, those who love duck hunting and those who never have duck hunted.
User avatar
WoodyWhiffingMG
hunter
 
Posts: 8246
Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2008 9:30 pm
Location: Back in SW MICHIGAN

Re: 17 yrs. no warming?

Postby WoodyWhiffingMG » Wed Jun 19, 2013 7:20 pm

I'm done with this global warming argument, no matter the overwhelming evidence placed in front of people they can't admit they are following a faith based movement and have robbed so many of the true American Dream!
:beer:
There are only two types of people in the world, those who love duck hunting and those who never have duck hunted.
User avatar
WoodyWhiffingMG
hunter
 
Posts: 8246
Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2008 9:30 pm
Location: Back in SW MICHIGAN

Re: 17 yrs. no warming?

Postby slowshooter » Wed Jun 19, 2013 7:28 pm

WoodyWhiffingMG wrote:
slowshooter wrote:Do you believe in evolution?


And don't you dare say it is a proven scientific fact!
That is a designation very few things have earned the right to be called...

Evolution is a scientific theory based on a very little evidence and excepted because there is no other solution with evidence either.



You aren't able to distinguish between the science that has proven evolution as fact and the work that has to be done to fully understand the mechanisms of natural selection.

Suffice to say. You lose. And science wins again!!!! :lol3: :lol3:
All this for a bowl of borscht.
User avatar
slowshooter
hunter
 
Posts: 9011
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 8:44 pm
Location: San Jose, CA

Re: 17 yrs. no warming?

Postby slowshooter » Wed Jun 19, 2013 7:34 pm

Chilidawg wrote:I don't think you understand how science works.


Show him a pidgur! :lol3:
All this for a bowl of borscht.
User avatar
slowshooter
hunter
 
Posts: 9011
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 8:44 pm
Location: San Jose, CA

Re: 17 yrs. no warming?

Postby slowshooter » Wed Jun 19, 2013 7:37 pm

WoodyWhiffingMG wrote:I'm done with this global warming argument, no matter the overwhelming evidence placed in front of people they can't admit they are following a faith based movement and have robbed so many of the true American Dream!
:beer:



I guess Hee Haw is on. :lol3:
All this for a bowl of borscht.
User avatar
slowshooter
hunter
 
Posts: 9011
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 8:44 pm
Location: San Jose, CA

Re: 17 yrs. no warming?

Postby WoodyWhiffingMG » Wed Jun 19, 2013 7:40 pm

I've decided to block unintelligent people... so if slow makes an intellectual statement someone else will have inform me. Thanks!
There are only two types of people in the world, those who love duck hunting and those who never have duck hunted.
User avatar
WoodyWhiffingMG
hunter
 
Posts: 8246
Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2008 9:30 pm
Location: Back in SW MICHIGAN

Re: 17 yrs. no warming?

Postby lancej » Wed Jun 19, 2013 7:41 pm

WoodyWhiffingMG wrote:I'm done with this Religion (choose your favorite) argument, no matter the overwhelming evidence placed in front of people they can't admit they are following a faith based movement and have robbed so many of the true American Dream!
:beer:



FIFY

Lance
It is the shared experiences of companionship that make loss bearable.
RIP Orion, May where you are be full of Rabbits.

when you start explaining what you're seeing, you see what you've been looking at
User avatar
lancej
hunter
 
Posts: 3215
Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 2:19 pm
Location: Mount Aukum, CA

Re: 17 yrs. no warming?

Postby Indaswamp » Wed Jun 19, 2013 7:44 pm

slowshooter wrote:
WoodyWhiffingMG wrote:
slowshooter wrote:
Indaswamp wrote:
slowshooter wrote:
Indaswamp wrote:
slowshooter wrote:Parallel science is not always science.

People that disagree with the 97% of scientists that believe climate change is due to humans activity has a few things going on.
1. They actually don't understand what a scientific consensus is, or how it can change given additional information.
2. Dey be mowrons! :lol3:
3. They are sheep to oil company funded demagogues

This isn't even a liberal vs conservative argument. Anyone that goes there proves they can't intellectually fight their way out of a wet lunch bag.

That is false. 97% of scientists do not believe in global warming.....



http://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus


Your pubic lice researcher friends and Kinsey don't count since climate scientists are the only ones that actually do the work. :lol3:

Nice try though. :lol3:

google confirmation bias...



Dismissing almost 100% of scientists that are working on climate science and who are using that strange and voodoo like system called "scientific method" only shows your bias. Confirmation and otherwise.

You lose. Science wins. :hammer:


Are you talking about yourself?
And can you read my post, it explains how many actually agree


You also lose. Science still wins. :hammer: :lol3: :lol3:

you seriously need to google the definition of the scientific method. Withholding data and methodology from peers does not fit that definition, which many touting global warming have done....
The Cajun 7 Course Meal; 1 lb. of boudin and a six pack of Abita beer.

Save the Marsh, Eat a Nutria!

Image
User avatar
Indaswamp
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 56795
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 8:40 pm
Location: South Louisiana

Re: 17 yrs. no warming?

Postby Indaswamp » Wed Jun 19, 2013 7:45 pm

And if you are calling that science, well...you don't know a damn thing about how it is suppose to be done.
The Cajun 7 Course Meal; 1 lb. of boudin and a six pack of Abita beer.

Save the Marsh, Eat a Nutria!

Image
User avatar
Indaswamp
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 56795
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 8:40 pm
Location: South Louisiana

Re: 17 yrs. no warming?

Postby WoodyWhiffingMG » Wed Jun 19, 2013 7:46 pm

lancej wrote:
WoodyWhiffingMG wrote:I'm done with this Religion (choose your favorite) argument, no matter the overwhelming evidence placed in front of people they can't admit they are following a faith based movement and have robbed so many of the true American Dream!
:beer:



FIFY

Lance


No I admit that I clearly follow a faith based religion (by definition) and some try to use it in a way unbefitting of its purpose and scope, but I haven't and preach the exact opposite nice try, Lance! Another post so unthought out is going to land you in Slow's boat...
Now post the proof of me backing argument with religion not logical thought.
There are only two types of people in the world, those who love duck hunting and those who never have duck hunted.
User avatar
WoodyWhiffingMG
hunter
 
Posts: 8246
Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2008 9:30 pm
Location: Back in SW MICHIGAN

Re: 17 yrs. no warming?

Postby Indawoods » Wed Jun 19, 2013 7:56 pm

Chilidawg wrote:
WoodyWhiffingMG wrote:
And don't you dare say it is a proven scientific fact!


So the fact that it has been demonstrated numerous times in the laboratory has no meaning to you?


evolution on a geological scale?

you're an idiot.
assateague wrote:I'm not THAT cheap.


-on the viability of Pabst Blue Ribbon as a thirst quenching barley pop.
User avatar
Indawoods
hunter
 
Posts: 6449
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 10:08 pm
Location: Gonzales, LA

Re: 17 yrs. no warming?

Postby Indawoods » Wed Jun 19, 2013 8:00 pm

Chilidawg wrote:
WoodyWhiffingMG wrote:
Chilidawg wrote:
WoodyWhiffingMG wrote:
And don't you dare say it is a proven scientific fact!


So the fact that it has been demonstrated numerous times in the laboratory has no meaning to you?


There are many theories demonstrated in a lab and latter proven wrong, but please provid a source.
I would be interested in reading it.


What theories have been demonstrated in a a lab and later proven to be wrong?

How can you demonstrate something using the scientific method that is wrong?

I don't think you understand how science works.


now I know you're not just an idiot, you're functionally retarded, and scientifically unaware.
assateague wrote:I'm not THAT cheap.


-on the viability of Pabst Blue Ribbon as a thirst quenching barley pop.
User avatar
Indawoods
hunter
 
Posts: 6449
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 10:08 pm
Location: Gonzales, LA

Re: 17 yrs. no warming?

Postby WoodyWhiffingMG » Wed Jun 19, 2013 8:03 pm

Now, now Woods, lets give him a chance to show "proof"
There are only two types of people in the world, those who love duck hunting and those who never have duck hunted.
User avatar
WoodyWhiffingMG
hunter
 
Posts: 8246
Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2008 9:30 pm
Location: Back in SW MICHIGAN

Re: 17 yrs. no warming?

Postby Indawoods » Wed Jun 19, 2013 8:10 pm

WoodyWhiffingMG wrote:Now, now Woods, lets give him a chance to show "proof"


doesn't exist.

I really hope for his sake he thought you were referencing CO2 as a greenhouse gas and missed the shift in the thread. In that case he merely misread. his assertion that the scientific method is perfect when it is carried out at the hands of imperfect human scientists then makes him just naive.
assateague wrote:I'm not THAT cheap.


-on the viability of Pabst Blue Ribbon as a thirst quenching barley pop.
User avatar
Indawoods
hunter
 
Posts: 6449
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 10:08 pm
Location: Gonzales, LA

Re: 17 yrs. no warming?

Postby slowshooter » Wed Jun 19, 2013 8:29 pm

Indaswamp wrote:you seriously need to google the definition of the scientific method. Withholding data and methodology from peers does not fit that definition, which many touting global warming have done....


How many? :lol3:
All this for a bowl of borscht.
User avatar
slowshooter
hunter
 
Posts: 9011
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 8:44 pm
Location: San Jose, CA

Re: 17 yrs. no warming?

Postby slowshooter » Wed Jun 19, 2013 8:31 pm

Indaswamp wrote:And if you are calling that science, well...you don't know a damn thing about how it is suppose to be done.


Every time you type science I can tell you mentally do air quotes with your fingers. :lol3:
All this for a bowl of borscht.
User avatar
slowshooter
hunter
 
Posts: 9011
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 8:44 pm
Location: San Jose, CA

PreviousNext

Return to Controversial Issues Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: waldo9190 and 6 guests