A conservative's wet-dream

A forum not related to waterfowl for discussing the more controversial and hot topic issues in our world from immigration, politics, the war, etc..

Moderators: Smackaduck, MM

A conservative's wet-dream

Postby Glimmerjim » Sat Jul 27, 2013 1:25 am

http://movies.yahoo.com/news/act-killin ... 00445.html

"In director Joshua Oppenheimer's film, Indonesian gangsters recreate government sanctioned killings of as many as 1 million communists, left-wingers, union workers and others "

Aaaaaahhh. To finally have control of the "takers" and entitlement recipients. NOW, we can start to make some REAL money!
Glimmerjim
hunter
 
Posts: 10885
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 10:41 am


Re: A conservative's wet-dream

Postby slowshooter » Sat Jul 27, 2013 2:49 am

Darn those people that just won't sign up for the program!
All this for a bowl of borscht.
User avatar
slowshooter
hunter
 
Posts: 9011
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 8:44 pm
Location: San Jose, CA

Re: A conservative's wet-dream

Postby Glimmerjim » Sat Jul 27, 2013 2:54 am

slowshooter wrote:Darn those people that just won't sign up for the program!

Start assigning people to gather names outside of banks, stock brokerages, HIGH level atty's offices (ambulance chaser's don't count), CEO's of Fortune 500 companies, etc and you'd have a consensus in days!
Glimmerjim
hunter
 
Posts: 10885
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 10:41 am

Re: A conservative's wet-dream

Postby assateague » Sat Jul 27, 2013 5:29 am

I agree- let's get rid of EVERYONE who only takes from the system. But of course that includes those at the top AND those at the bottom. Welfare is welfare, whether corporate or cash assistance. If you're against one, it is intellectually dishonest to be for the other.
WOLVERINES

Give a man a fish and he eats for a day. Let a man vote to give himself a fish and he eats until society collapses.
User avatar
assateague
Emu hunter extraordinaire
 
Posts: 21277
Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2009 12:25 pm
Location: Eastern Shore, People's Republic of Maryland

Re: A conservative's wet-dream

Postby Glimmerjim » Sat Jul 27, 2013 5:35 am

assateague wrote:I agree- let's get rid of EVERYONE who only takes from the system. But of course that includes those at the top AND those at the bottom. Welfare is welfare, whether corporate or cash assistance. If you're against one, it is intellectually dishonest to be for the other.

Somehow, assigning blame and lack of responsibility, and recompense for value, to those at the top and those at the bottom sounds suspiciously Socialistic. We may have more in common than I ever considered! :lol3:
Glimmerjim
hunter
 
Posts: 10885
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 10:41 am

Re: A conservative's wet-dream

Postby cartervj » Sat Jul 27, 2013 6:56 am

Glimmerjim wrote:
assateague wrote:I agree- let's get rid of EVERYONE who only takes from the system. But of course that includes those at the top AND those at the bottom. Welfare is welfare, whether corporate or cash assistance. If you're against one, it is intellectually dishonest to be for the other.

Somehow, assigning blame and lack of responsibility, and recompense for value, to those at the top and those at the bottom sounds suspiciously Socialistic. We may have more in common than I ever considered! :lol3:



you call that socialism :huh:
sounds moire like potential democrat voters at the bottom and republicans at the top, then again Solyndra and the likes are Democrat valued
“Nothing makes me more certain of the victory of our ideas than our success in the universities” – Adolf H, 1930
User avatar
cartervj
hunter
 
Posts: 7366
Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2009 3:01 pm
Location: NW AL

Re: A conservative's wet-dream

Postby swampbilly 1980 » Sat Jul 27, 2013 7:03 am

"Only happens in Hollywood" :sad:
Swampbilly1980- I got a feeva',..and the only cure is more Mergansers and face paint.
User avatar
swampbilly 1980
Forum & State Moderator
 
Posts: 9136
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 5:53 am
Location: Gloucester,Va.

Re: A conservative's wet-dream

Postby cartervj » Sat Jul 27, 2013 7:05 am

and Hollywood is not to happening these days :lol3:
“Nothing makes me more certain of the victory of our ideas than our success in the universities” – Adolf H, 1930
User avatar
cartervj
hunter
 
Posts: 7366
Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2009 3:01 pm
Location: NW AL

Re: A conservative's wet-dream

Postby ScaupHunter » Sat Jul 27, 2013 2:56 pm

Sounds like a socialist dream! Aka Mao, Stalin, etc....
Bella's
Decoy Setting Pro Staff
Boat Operator Pro Staff
Duck Shooting Pro Staff
Warm Towel Pro Staff
Snack Supply Pro Staff

He works for free! Who's the B now?
User avatar
ScaupHunter
hunter
 
Posts: 6766
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2012 5:57 am

Re: A conservative's wet-dream

Postby Glimmerjim » Sat Jul 27, 2013 2:58 pm

swampbilly 1980 wrote:"Only happens in Hollywood" :sad:

I hear Hollywood is moving to Seattle.
Glimmerjim
hunter
 
Posts: 10885
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 10:41 am

Re: A conservative's wet-dream

Postby ScaupHunter » Sat Jul 27, 2013 5:11 pm

BDDD2 can start a new career as a bad guy in the movies.
Bella's
Decoy Setting Pro Staff
Boat Operator Pro Staff
Duck Shooting Pro Staff
Warm Towel Pro Staff
Snack Supply Pro Staff

He works for free! Who's the B now?
User avatar
ScaupHunter
hunter
 
Posts: 6766
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2012 5:57 am

Re: A conservative's wet-dream

Postby slowshooter » Sun Jul 28, 2013 10:26 am

assateague wrote:I agree- let's get rid of EVERYONE who only takes from the system. But of course that includes those at the top AND those at the bottom. Welfare is welfare, whether corporate or cash assistance. If you're against one, it is intellectually dishonest to be for the other.


Let's not just kill Jews that fight us. Let's kill them all because it's intellectually dishonest to be for the rest. -($)Hitler

Let's not help the elderly poor. Because if your against the poor that take advantage of the system it's intellectually dishonest to be for any of the poor. -Any GOP house member

Let's bring back prohibition, because if you are against people getting high on pot then it's intellectually dishonest to be for getting high at all. - Carrie Nation's Zombie corpse.

Let's get rid of thinking in entirely. Because if you are against having bad thoughts it's intellectually dishonest to be for any other kind of thought. -Assagoof
Last edited by slowshooter on Sun Jul 28, 2013 7:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
All this for a bowl of borscht.
User avatar
slowshooter
hunter
 
Posts: 9011
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 8:44 pm
Location: San Jose, CA

Re: A conservative's wet-dream

Postby SpinnerMan » Sun Jul 28, 2013 12:17 pm

Glimmerjim wrote:http://movies.yahoo.com/news/act-killing-director-filming-shocking-documentary-gave-nightmares-010700445.html

"In director Joshua Oppenheimer's film, Indonesian gangsters recreate government sanctioned killings of as many as 1 million communists, left-wingers, union workers and others "

Aaaaaahhh. To finally have control of the "takers" and entitlement recipients. NOW, we can start to make some REAL money!

You may think it is a conservatives dream, but the liberals (leftists is probably more accurate, but they are synonyms in most cases today) have made it reality on numerous occasions :yes:

How does a small decentralized government dedicated to protecting the life, liberty, and property of the individual (the true conservative dream) lead to a powerful government committing mass murder? :huh:

Unions are good as long as they have no monopoly power. :thumbsup: Union Yes. Monopoly Hell No.

Free from government control and free to live your life and responsible for the consequences of those choices. Free to choose not to be your brother's keeper if you do not believe that is the best for your brother or if your just a self-centered greedy bastard, whatever, you are free to be all you can be or as little as you wish.
A politician thinks of the next election; a statesman of the next generation. A politician looks for the success of his party; a statesman for that of the country. The statesman wished to steer, while the politician was satisfied to drift.
User avatar
SpinnerMan
hunter
 
Posts: 16433
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2005 11:24 am
Location: Joliet, IL

Re: A conservative's wet-dream

Postby slowshooter » Sun Jul 28, 2013 7:56 pm

SpinnerMan wrote:
Glimmerjim wrote:http://movies.yahoo.com/news/act-killing-director-filming-shocking-documentary-gave-nightmares-010700445.html

"In director Joshua Oppenheimer's film, Indonesian gangsters recreate government sanctioned killings of as many as 1 million communists, left-wingers, union workers and others "

Aaaaaahhh. To finally have control of the "takers" and entitlement recipients. NOW, we can start to make some REAL money!

You may think it is a conservatives dream, but the liberals (leftists is probably more accurate, but they are synonyms in most cases today) have made it reality on numerous occasions :yes:

How does a small decentralized government dedicated to protecting the life, liberty, and property of the individual (the true conservative dream) lead to a powerful government committing mass murder? :huh:

Unions are good as long as they have no monopoly power. :thumbsup: Union Yes. Monopoly Hell No.

Free from government control and free to live your life and responsible for the consequences of those choices. Free to choose not to be your brother's keeper if you do not believe that is the best for your brother or if your just a self-centered greedy bastard, whatever, you are free to be all you can be or as little as you wish.


Sorry bub. You New Age Confederates just have to get used to being part of the Union.

:lol3:
All this for a bowl of borscht.
User avatar
slowshooter
hunter
 
Posts: 9011
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 8:44 pm
Location: San Jose, CA

Re: A conservative's wet-dream

Postby Butta boom » Sun Jul 28, 2013 10:49 pm

The south will rise again.

People think the civil war was fought over slavery, it was all about secession.

The north could not support themselves without the south growin all da crops. Kinda like now, they don wanna do da work but dey wanna tell us how to do it.

Pretty soon we get smart and get rid of dese massas.

I have a dream.
Butta boom
hunter
 
Posts: 414
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2012 9:43 pm

Re: A conservative's wet-dream

Postby slowshooter » Sun Jul 28, 2013 11:20 pm

Butta boom wrote:The south will rise again.


They would just lose again.

People think the civil war was fought over slavery, it was all about secession.


A lot of things contributed to the war. But just so you have a better understanding....

From Mississippi:

Our position is thoroughly identified with the institution of slavery - the greatest material interest of the world. Its labor supplies the product, which constitutes by far the largest and most important portions of commerce of the earth. These products are peculiar to the climate verging on the tropical regions, and by an imperious law of nature, none but the black race can bear exposure to the tropical sun. These products have become necessities of the world, and a blow at slavery is a blow at commerce and civilization.

From Texas:

We hold as undeniable truths that the governments of the various States, and of the confederacy itself, were established exclusively by the white race, for themselves and their posterity; that the African race had no agency in their establishment; that they were rightfully held and regarded as an inferior and dependent race, and in that condition only could their existence in this country be rendered beneficial or tolerable. That in this free government all white men are and of right ought to be entitled to equal civil and political rights; that the servitude of the African race, as existing in these States, is mutually beneficial to both bond and free, and is abundantly authorized and justified by the experience of mankind, and the revealed will of the Almighty Creator, as recognized by all Christian nations; while the destruction of the existing relations between the two races, as advocated by our sectional enemies, would bring inevitable calamities upon both and desolation upon the fifteen slave-holding states.

From South Carolina:

The General Government, as the common agent, passed laws to carry into effect these stipulations of the States. For many years these laws were executed. But an increasing hostility on the part of the non-slaveholding States to the institution of slavery, has led to a disregard of their obligations, and the laws of the General Government have ceased to effect the objects of the Constitution. The States of Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island, New York, Pennsylvania, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Wisconsin and Iowa, have enacted laws which either nullify the Acts of Congress or render useless any attempt to execute them. In many of these States the fugitive is discharged from service or labor claimed, and in none of them has the State Government complied with the stipulation made in the Constitution. The State of New Jersey, at an early day, passed a law in conformity with her constitutional obligation; but the current of anti-slavery feeling has led her more recently to enact laws which render inoperative the remedies provided by her own law and by the laws of Congress. In the State of New York even the right of transit for a slave has been denied by her tribunals; and the States of Ohio and Iowa have refused to surrender to justice fugitives charged with murder, and with inciting servile insurrection in the State of Virginia. Thus the constituted compact has been deliberately broken and disregarded by the non-slaveholding States, and the consequence follows that South Carolina is released from her obligation...

The north could not support themselves without the south growin all da crops. Kinda like now, they don wanna do da work but dey wanna tell us how to do it.


You live in California. Quit pretending you are living in the South.

Pretty soon we get smart and get rid of dese massas.


When are you moving to West Virginia and marrying a 14 year old?

I have a dream.


Yeah, it was your first sentence.
All this for a bowl of borscht.
User avatar
slowshooter
hunter
 
Posts: 9011
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 8:44 pm
Location: San Jose, CA

Re: A conservative's wet-dream

Postby Glimmerjim » Mon Jul 29, 2013 1:51 am

slowshooter wrote:
Butta boom wrote:The south will rise again.


They would just lose again.

People think the civil war was fought over slavery, it was all about secession.


A lot of things contributed to the war. But just so you have a better understanding....

From Mississippi:

Our position is thoroughly identified with the institution of slavery - the greatest material interest of the world. Its labor supplies the product, which constitutes by far the largest and most important portions of commerce of the earth. These products are peculiar to the climate verging on the tropical regions, and by an imperious law of nature, none but the black race can bear exposure to the tropical sun. These products have become necessities of the world, and a blow at slavery is a blow at commerce and civilization.

From Texas:

We hold as undeniable truths that the governments of the various States, and of the confederacy itself, were established exclusively by the white race, for themselves and their posterity; that the African race had no agency in their establishment; that they were rightfully held and regarded as an inferior and dependent race, and in that condition only could their existence in this country be rendered beneficial or tolerable. That in this free government all white men are and of right ought to be entitled to equal civil and political rights; that the servitude of the African race, as existing in these States, is mutually beneficial to both bond and free, and is abundantly authorized and justified by the experience of mankind, and the revealed will of the Almighty Creator, as recognized by all Christian nations; while the destruction of the existing relations between the two races, as advocated by our sectional enemies, would bring inevitable calamities upon both and desolation upon the fifteen slave-holding states.

From South Carolina:

The General Government, as the common agent, passed laws to carry into effect these stipulations of the States. For many years these laws were executed. But an increasing hostility on the part of the non-slaveholding States to the institution of slavery, has led to a disregard of their obligations, and the laws of the General Government have ceased to effect the objects of the Constitution. The States of Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island, New York, Pennsylvania, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Wisconsin and Iowa, have enacted laws which either nullify the Acts of Congress or render useless any attempt to execute them. In many of these States the fugitive is discharged from service or labor claimed, and in none of them has the State Government complied with the stipulation made in the Constitution. The State of New Jersey, at an early day, passed a law in conformity with her constitutional obligation; but the current of anti-slavery feeling has led her more recently to enact laws which render inoperative the remedies provided by her own law and by the laws of Congress. In the State of New York even the right of transit for a slave has been denied by her tribunals; and the States of Ohio and Iowa have refused to surrender to justice fugitives charged with murder, and with inciting servile insurrection in the State of Virginia. Thus the constituted compact has been deliberately broken and disregarded by the non-slaveholding States, and the consequence follows that South Carolina is released from her obligation...

The north could not support themselves without the south growin all da crops. Kinda like now, they don wanna do da work but dey wanna tell us how to do it.


You live in California. Quit pretending you are living in the South.

Pretty soon we get smart and get rid of dese massas.


When are you moving to West Virginia and marrying a 14 year old?

I have a dream.


Yeah, it was your first sentence.

:lol3: :lol3:
Glimmerjim
hunter
 
Posts: 10885
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 10:41 am

Re: A conservative's wet-dream

Postby ScaupHunter » Mon Jul 29, 2013 8:30 am

Butta boom wrote:The south will rise again.

People think the civil war was fought over slavery, it was all about secession.

The north could not support themselves without the south growin all da crops. Kinda like now, they don wanna do da work but dey wanna tell us how to do it.

Pretty soon we get smart and get rid of dese massas.

I have a dream.


That is a pretty sad dream. It will take twelve people over the age of 20 to come up with 32 teeth. Your army will take so long eating it's food it will miss the battles and loose by default.
Bella's
Decoy Setting Pro Staff
Boat Operator Pro Staff
Duck Shooting Pro Staff
Warm Towel Pro Staff
Snack Supply Pro Staff

He works for free! Who's the B now?
User avatar
ScaupHunter
hunter
 
Posts: 6766
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2012 5:57 am

Re: A conservative's wet-dream

Postby assateague » Mon Jul 29, 2013 11:49 am

slowshooter wrote:
assateague wrote:I agree- let's get rid of EVERYONE who only takes from the system. But of course that includes those at the top AND those at the bottom. Welfare is welfare, whether corporate or cash assistance. If you're against one, it is intellectually dishonest to be for the other.


Let's not just kill Jews that fight us. Let's kill them all because it's intellectually dishonest to be for the rest. -($)Hitler

Let's not help the elderly poor. Because if your against the poor that take advantage of the system it's intellectually dishonest to be for any of the poor. -Any GOP house member

Let's bring back prohibition, because if you are against people getting high on pot then it's intellectually dishonest to be for getting high at all. - Carrie Nation's Zombie corpse.

Let's get rid of thinking in entirely. Because if you are against having bad thoughts it's intellectually dishonest to be for any other kind of thought. -Assagoof



Was Robin Hood a hero or a villain to you?
WOLVERINES

Give a man a fish and he eats for a day. Let a man vote to give himself a fish and he eats until society collapses.
User avatar
assateague
Emu hunter extraordinaire
 
Posts: 21277
Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2009 12:25 pm
Location: Eastern Shore, People's Republic of Maryland

Re: A conservative's wet-dream

Postby TomKat » Mon Jul 29, 2013 1:14 pm

ImageUploadedByTapatalk 21375125262.746547.jpg


Just saying. All in the constitution.



Blog- http://www.ksducks.com
Image
User avatar
TomKat
Dorothy
 
Posts: 11497
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2010 11:18 am
Location: NE Kansas

Re: A conservative's wet-dream

Postby boney fingers » Mon Jul 29, 2013 2:08 pm

Butta boom wrote:People think the civil war was fought over slavery, it was all about secession.



And secession had plenty to do with slavery.
boney fingers
hunter
 
Posts: 882
Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2012 6:30 pm

Re: A conservative's wet-dream

Postby ScaupHunter » Mon Jul 29, 2013 2:27 pm

Am I the only one who thinks Slow has a serious transference problem? He keeps trying to take the worst parts of the progressive / liberal agenda and history and place it on people who just want to be left alone to live their lives. I know he is a rabble rouser and likes to stir the pot a lot. It seems to me he is grumpier and a bit more deranged with his mania these days.
Last edited by ScaupHunter on Mon Jul 29, 2013 2:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Bella's
Decoy Setting Pro Staff
Boat Operator Pro Staff
Duck Shooting Pro Staff
Warm Towel Pro Staff
Snack Supply Pro Staff

He works for free! Who's the B now?
User avatar
ScaupHunter
hunter
 
Posts: 6766
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2012 5:57 am

Re: A conservative's wet-dream

Postby Rat Creek » Mon Jul 29, 2013 2:55 pm

ScaupHunter wrote:Am I the only one who thinks Slow has a serious transference problem? He keeps trying to take the worst parts of the progressive / liberal agenda and history and place it on people who just want to be left alone to live their lives. I know he is a rabble rouser and likes to stir the pot a lot. It seems to me he is grumpier and a bit more deranges with his mania these days.


Exactly, and why the premise of their jokes is not humorous. Conservatives want to be left alone. We do not want to tell people how to live or work, what to eat or drive or anything else, so the idea of an all powerful government being conservative just does not make any sense, and thus lacks the basis for humor.

Libs love to project their bias and hate on their opposition. Show me a liberal with a coexist bumper sticker, and I will show you a useful idiot who does not want to coexist with anyone they disagree with. It is the libs who continue to divide people by demographic. It is destructive, but serves their leadership well.
Rat Creek
Rat Creek
hunter
 
Posts: 4573
Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2004 4:11 pm
Location: Overland Park, KS

Re: A conservative's wet-dream

Postby SpinnerMan » Mon Jul 29, 2013 5:15 pm

Rat Creek wrote:Show me a liberal with a coexist bumper sticker, and I will show you a useful idiot who does not want to coexist with anyone they disagree with.
Especially someone that takes their religion very seriously.
A politician thinks of the next election; a statesman of the next generation. A politician looks for the success of his party; a statesman for that of the country. The statesman wished to steer, while the politician was satisfied to drift.
User avatar
SpinnerMan
hunter
 
Posts: 16433
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2005 11:24 am
Location: Joliet, IL

Re: A conservative's wet-dream

Postby slowshooter » Tue Jul 30, 2013 4:33 am

Good gawd you guys are snivelers.

First I get complaints because I use smileys and so when I stop using them you complain that I'm grumpy. You guys need to go take some midol and lay down. The cramps must be killing you.


:lol3: :lol3: :lol3:
All this for a bowl of borscht.
User avatar
slowshooter
hunter
 
Posts: 9011
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 8:44 pm
Location: San Jose, CA

Next

Return to Controversial Issues Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests