huntmmup wrote: ScaupHunter wrote:
huntmmup wrote:What is this butthurt term? Is it supposed to be funny or demeaning? It makes you sound like a child. You said explicitly that we should only trust the experts on subjects, well here you go all but 1 of the experts agree.
Yep, totally butt hurt. His dream of the great lie is dying. Anyone who has ever dealt with science knows full well that no one agrees 99% on anything. Only a moronic fool believes they would or can. Science simply doesn't work that way.
So you are saying that less than 99% of scientists believe that light is wave-particle? Less than 99% of scientists believe that our planet has a magnetic field which protects us from cosmic radiation? Less than 99% of scientists believe that DNA is the building block of biological development?
You are the moronic fool to say that 99%+ scientists can't agree on things. When a theory has been examined thoroughly over decades, and the same conclusion is reached by every scientist who tests that theory, then they can all agree.
If they dont agree where are all the papers refuting that global warming is primarily man made, you moronic fool.
Hey Knuck. How many scientists thought the world was flat? How many would have agreed? How many thought the Atom was only made of Protons, Neutrons, and Electrons. How many would have said that was true 100%? Your argument is specious at best. For a scientist you sure do suck at making the proper assumptions, which is what leads to your horribly flawed view of the conclusions being made. Science is evolving and your grandchildren will be laughing at your stupidity in the not so distant future.
Again! Any scientist or human that believes anything that 99% of the scientists agrees on is accurate is a fool. What we know today will be completely different in 10, 50, and 100 years. Every good scientist knows that his or her models are wrong. The questions is how wrong and are the results even slightly applicable to the real world. When you have scientists riding an agenda and looking for money you have corruption instead of science.
By the way, since you seem to have a rather self inflated view of yourself. Spinnerman is a Nuke. As in a Phd type nuke. Multiple degrees. Top in his field. That kind of guy. Plenty of other folks here have advanced degrees. Not only are you not something special in this crowd, your ignorance of real science is showing! Me I am just a lowly BSCE. Only one little pitiful degree. Just a non-technical degree type. You know Civil Engineering. You know where we take all the stuff the guys who do science find and then apply it to the real world. You know who we are. The guys who pizz you off when we come back and tell you that your theory was wrong and doesn't really work in the world of reality.
The one primary thing I learned in college about folks getting advanced degrees was that being a doctorate does not make you intelligent. It just makes you educated. I have seen genius level doctorates who are to stupid to do anything of real value for science, the world, and humanity as a whole. I have also seen moderately intelligent doctorates perform amazing research projects and produce incredible results that benefit us all.
Climb down off you self imposed pedestal. No one here is impressed.
Stop acting the fool. No one here is going to agree with you when you claim 99% of all scientists agree on anything. They quite simply don't. Now if you want to show some scientific integrity and actually discuss and link to what they actually agreed on then we can have a discussion of the merits of your points. Until then you are just another 16 year old in your mommies basement making claims to fame.