bluewing77 wrote:no disrespect to anyone from, part of, or planning a large family...
Question: with a limited amount of natural resources, energy, land, water, etc and rising costs of health care, social security mess, what is a responsible or reasonable # of children for a family to have in this day and age?
wackemstackem wrote:Minorites out breed the white man 3 to 1.
Just thought Id would throw that out their.
A hundred years ago families were large, 8-12, kids worked, high infant mortality rate, illnesses and injuries killed a lot.
Locked&Loaded wrote: I got out shot by a 13 yeard old girl.
jrockncash wrote:Is that mask only for ghosts or can fat guys with little weiners use it too?
Minorites out breed the white man 3 to 1.
Just thought Id would throw that out their
jehler wrote:when I become dictator of this country after the gas shortage breakdown of society I will appoint don to be the reproduction minister. don you will be responsible for deciding who is able to reproduce or not.
Pumpgunner wrote:1 is plenty for me! My wife and I made a conscious decision to have 1 baby. More people=more commerce=more suburbs and strip malls being built on wetlands=less ducks and geese to shoot at!
(of course, ask my wife in 2 or 3 years how many kids we should have and you'll probably get a different answer )
wackemstackem wrote:You work in a hospital rite Blue...?You tell us whos out breeding who.
BTW I have 2,a boy and girl,I got snipped,no more for me.