LIGHT12 wrote:What part of taking money from chinese, or giving nuclear technology to N. Korea, or stipping our CIA, FBI, and military of on the ground recourses to successfully spy on our enemy does not hurt our country. What part of a President purgerying himself, or obstructing justice does not hurt our coutry. Let alone the fact if the CEO of exon was having his way with an intern people would want heads to roll. But the president, that does not hurt the standing our out country in the eyes of other nations.
Yah Bush has made msitakes, but I think some of his bravado is trying to stand up and put our country ahead of the others as Reagan did. He just has not been able to do it in that manner. Partially because of the politics of today, and partially because of the media of today. And I believe partially because he underestimated the leaks he would have in places such as the State Department.
A lot of things happen in every administration that the people do not know about, nor need to know about. It is the way business has been done for years. I think an Democratic party and all to eager media have demonized things that have been done, that had a different administration done them it would have been forgotten long ago.
Things like blaming Bush for Katrina. You don't see any out cry in Iowa right now. The people are helping themselves, the state is helping. And as someone told me, FEMA showed up and just got in the way. New Orleans, a city run by idiots couldn't take care of themselves. Squandered money that could have helped lessen the problems that occured, and when the poop hit the fan cried foul on the Feds. Liberal run city, blamed Bush when they couldn't take care of themselves.
On a side note. Why is it always Democratic run precincts that cry voter disinfranchisement by Republicans in every election. They usually run the precincts involved. LOL.
AMEN! Couldn't have said it better myself.
I was going to ignore this, but since you now have a fan and perhaps a quorum (sp?)... so I need to respond.
Taking money form the Chinese... thank God that'snot happening nowadays... err, wait... we owe them bagillions!
i didn't know Clinton had "stipped" (stripped?) our intelligence and defense so we didn't know or couldn't do anything. Shucks, Richard Clark seemed to know what was up. And that "Clinton" military (stripped as it was) looked great in Afghanistan. They were ridin' horses with the Northern Army and everything... just like in Lawrence of Arabia. Awesome! Or did I miss something there?
you wrote: "What part of a President purgerying himself, or obstructing justice does not hurt our coutry. Let alone the fact if the CEO of exon was having his way with an intern people would want heads to roll. But the president, that does not hurt the standing our out country in the eyes of other nations. "
first, make it easier on yourself (this will be my last English lesson, NOT!) instead of "perjerying himself" just say "committing perjury". it's easier, sounds better and is an actual word. (okay, that was a cheap shot. sorry.) but I already covered this so won't bother to again, except to say that the rest of the world held Clinton in very high regard unlike toady. apparently they don't have a big problem with interoffice hanky panky and then lying about it. go figure.
Next: what is you know about the CEO of Exxon and his interns? Whatever it is, I doubt heads would roll if he got cuaght... unless it was they guy who caught him, who's head rolled... but I'm confident that the intern would be rolling around however the CEO of Exxon preferred if he/she were so asked. Come On! The CEO of Exxon has lots of power (and $$) and could promote the intern into a cushy position (no pun intened). And that my friend's is how the free capitalisitic market works!
I'm having too much fun playin' with your words and should stop, cuz I think you were being sincere and I'm just goofin' around. See ya later.