Just some sarcasm about the stupidity of the he's qualified because he is winning.dudejcb wrote:Come on Spinner, the Hitler reference? Really? That's beneath you.
And that's the BEST the Democrats have to offer. No history and let's hope for the best. Why didn't the Democratic party and the Democratic voters tell him to get some history first. Why this year? Why not 8, 12, or 16 years from now when we wouldn't have to "hope for the best" and have something to base our opinion on.dudejcb wrote:Yeah. We don't have a lot of obama history to work with. sometimes all you can do is make a judgement based on what you see and thinkk you know, and hope for the best.
I say we have no history at all that supports his ability to be a successful President. He has not accomplished anything along the way. I truly believe his Presidency will end up exactly like the current situation in Illinois. The Democrats put up a pretty boy future President that was unqualified for the office. He won because of Republican incompetence. Now the Democratic leaders in the Legislature think they run the state. The mayor is missing in action except for when he is throwing out random hair-brained schemes involving spending large sums of money that doesn't exist. He is Public Official A in the Tony Rezko investigation. It's a complete disaster in the state of Illinois. The Democrat Attorney General is scheming to be the next governor while her Father that is the Speaker of the Illinois House (I could have his title wrong but he is a top Democrat) fights with the Governor.
One party rule by a bunch of incompotents is a disaster and you are advocating one pary rule by an inexperienced President along with Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid that will completely disregard him and do what they want while Hillary schemes to be the next President. In the meantime all the investigations into Obama's shady friends and fundraising will go forward. I keep warning that you do not want Illinois politics to leave Illinois.