Ohio judge gives ACORN the finger

A forum not related to waterfowl for discussing the more controversial and hot topic issues in our world from immigration, politics, the war, etc..

Moderator: Smackaduck

Voter ID. should it be mandatory?

Total votes : 19

Ohio judge gives ACORN the finger

Postby don taylor » Fri Oct 10, 2008 7:23 am

A Ohio judge has said ACORN must verify all newly registered voters.

Thank God. From what I understand, the feds would have to be involved to give them jail time. If it done in mass numbers it goes from voter fraud to rigging the election.

The republicans say they are for this move, and providing proof. I wonder what the democrats will say? Racism? Who knows, but they won't be happy.

Chairman- The Allegheny Chapter of Delta Waterfowl.

https://www.facebook.com/groups/4277478 ... 6859634909
User avatar
don taylor
Forum & State Moderator
Posts: 7534
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 7:38 pm
Location: Westmoreland County, Pa.

Remove Advertisements


Postby msmall » Fri Oct 10, 2008 9:35 am

From what I heard on the news this morning ACORN is under severe scrutiny in Indiana too. Over 5000 new registered voters and over 2100 have been proven fraudulent. They signed up dead people and businesses with peoples name in it. Too bad for the legitimate people who wanted to sign up to vote. The state has put all 5000 applications aside until it can be further investigated.
User avatar
Posts: 951
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 7:53 pm
Location: east coast

Postby brucetonbottombandit » Fri Oct 10, 2008 9:42 am

[edit] Purges of voter lists
State efforts to purge voter rolls have led to disputes, notably in Florida. Before the 2000 election, Florida officials purged scores of thousands of registered voters on the grounds that they were convicted felons (and therefore ineligible to vote under Florida law). Many of those whose names were purged were "false positives" (not actually felons). (See Florida Central Voter File.) A post-election lawsuit brought by the NAACP, the People for the American Way Foundation, and other organizations resulted in a settlement in 2002 in which the state agreed to restore eligible voters to the rolls and take other steps to improve election procedures.[12] [13]

The issue returned to prominence in 2004 when Florida announced another planned purge, again based on a list of felons. The state government initially attempted to keep the list secret. When a court ordered its release, it was found to contain mostly Democrats and a disproportionate number of racial minorities. [14] Faced with media documentation that the list included thousands of errors, the state abandoned the attempt to use it.[15] Some of the voters improperly purged in 2000 had not been restored as of May 2004.[16]
From Wikipedia not only democrats try to influence vote in unscrupulous ways.
Posts: 80
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2008 11:18 am
Location: Tennesse

Postby MacMan » Fri Oct 10, 2008 1:44 pm

Sorry guys, should have put this here:

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/10/09/ ... index.html

I cannot believe the communist new network CNN gave it this much space
User avatar
Posts: 7880
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2007 10:59 am
Location: Someplace, TN

Return to Controversial Issues Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests