2 3/4 INCHERS!!!!

Interact with others on shot gun shells, reloading, ballistics, chokes, or anything that has to do with your shooting.

Moderators: donell67, Ohio Wildfowler, NV Guide, pennsyltucky

2 3/4 INCHERS!!!!

Postby Mallyard » Mon Jun 14, 2004 11:36 am

I curently got and awsome deal at wallmart on some Remington express and nitro STEEL #2 and #4 23/4 inch shells. I bought out wallmart walking away with about 25 boxes. I was wondering if these shells will have good power for ducks. In the past several years I've used Remingon 3" #2's. Will the shot size and the shorter shell make a big difference? Thanks in advance for any input...

Mallyard
Aim for their lips...
User avatar
Mallyard
Forum & State Moderator
 
Posts: 1139
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2004 12:25 pm
Location: KS


Postby h2ofwlr » Mon Jun 14, 2004 10:41 pm

It all depends of payload and Velocity.

Compare the 3" to the 2.75" and usually the payload is 1/8 oz less but velocity is the same. Which means a shorter effect pattern density range.

It still should be good to 40 yds though. The #4 shot is great on small ducks like teal and woodies. the 2s are good on bigger ducks like Mallards.
The Audacity of Bull Crap.
"Typical: Gun-loving, bitter bible-thumping white person" Barack Obama.
Hey I resemble that comment!!! Those are FIGHTING WORDS!!!
User avatar
h2ofwlr
Forum & State Moderator
 
Posts: 3091
Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2003 10:58 am
Location: "Buzz" at 8 months . Land of 10K polluted lakes

Postby Mallyard » Tue Jun 15, 2004 7:29 am

That was what I was kinda going for..... Ya wanna here a neat story.. Ok last year I had run out of big duck loads, so I put in 3 2.75 inch 6's, my teal shells. They where the winchester super X's. Any way This huge mallard was circling our deeks just at about 45 yards.... I finally got mad and said... "well i'll just put all three up at him, one bb will reach up there and mabye hit him."
So I pulled up and the first shot rolled him and when he hit the water he was dead. I couldn't belive that that small of a load could kill a mallard dead and around 50 yards.... Thanks for the info...:)



Mallyard
Aim for their lips...
User avatar
Mallyard
Forum & State Moderator
 
Posts: 1139
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2004 12:25 pm
Location: KS

Postby h2ofwlr » Wed Jun 16, 2004 9:18 am

Frankly you got lucky....
The Audacity of Bull Crap.
"Typical: Gun-loving, bitter bible-thumping white person" Barack Obama.
Hey I resemble that comment!!! Those are FIGHTING WORDS!!!
User avatar
h2ofwlr
Forum & State Moderator
 
Posts: 3091
Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2003 10:58 am
Location: "Buzz" at 8 months . Land of 10K polluted lakes

Postby Mallyard » Wed Jun 16, 2004 11:20 am

yep... sure did. Probably got 1 or 2 bb's through the head...
Aim for their lips...
User avatar
Mallyard
Forum & State Moderator
 
Posts: 1139
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2004 12:25 pm
Location: KS

Postby Pete-pec » Thu Sep 16, 2004 3:59 pm

I use the same shell, and it is virtually the same shell as a 3" The number 1 plus to the shell is the ability to cycle flawlessly, and the weight is still one and one quarter ounce. If you shoot at decoying ducks, you'll have plenty of shell. I like to use NO.1's and 2's. It will knock a goose stone cold dead as well! Wings cupped, Pete
User avatar
Pete-pec
Forum & State Moderator
 
Posts: 3146
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2004 7:39 am
Location: Southern Wisconsin

Postby ihuntducks » Wed Oct 13, 2004 3:59 pm

Before I got my new gun, all I could shoot was 2.75 loads. I must have killed over a thousand ducks with 2.75 #2's. If you shoot ducks in range you dont really need 3 inchers...
hold still.....................hold still........................ TAKE 'EM !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
ihuntducks
State Moderator
 
Posts: 90
Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2004 5:51 pm
Location: San Diego


Return to Shotshell, Reloading, Ballistics, & Chokes

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: driimis and 18 guests