Waterfowl lake near Hugo drained by mistake

In the land of 10,000 lakes, Minnesota duck hunting is some of the best. Log in and discuss your Minnesota duck hunting experiences.

Moderators: commander019, beretta24

Waterfowl lake near Hugo drained by mistake

Postby Trois_beaux_canards » Sun Jun 26, 2005 1:15 pm

Outdoors almanac: Waterfowl lake near Hugo drained by mistake
Doug Smith
June 26, 2005 ONOT0626


Rice Lake -- a small but popular public waterfowl hunting spot in the northern Twin Cities area near Hugo -- likely won't see much action this fall.

The lake was inadvertently drained this spring.

"Over half the lake is mud flats now," said Bob Welsh, Department of Natural Resources area wildlife manager. "The south end of the lake still has pockets of water a few inches deep. But you couldn't get in there with a boat."

The lake is part of the Paul Hugo Farms Wildlife Management Area, which is open to public hunting. Drained, it won't provide waterfowl habitat or recreation opportunities, Welsh said. The shallow 200-acre lake normally is 1½ to 3 feet deep, but it dropped precipitously after the Rice Creek Watershed District dredged a ditch that extends from the lake through the watershed, said Welsh.

Rice Lake: TodayThe watershed district did the maintenance work in March to reduce flooding downstream, but that activity apparently caused a "blowout" of soil between the lake and the dredged ditch, said Steve Hobbs, watershed district administrator.

The result was like pulling a bathtub plug. Despite recent rains, "there's very little water in the lake now," Welsh said.

DNR officials sent the watershed district a letter June 16 expressing dismay.

"DNR feels it is crucial to repair the runout and return Rice Lake to its previous condition," wrote Tim Bremicker, acting regional director. Without action, Welsh said, the area will become a cattail slough with no open water.

Rice Lake: BeforeWelsh said a water-control structure likely will have to be built to solve the problem. But that won't be easy. The lake's outlet is on private property. The soil is mostly peat. And the cost could be tens of thousands of dollars or even hundreds of thousands of dollars, he said.

Hobbs agreed such a structure will be needed. He said the district board met last week and is eager to sit down with DNR and work out a solution.

As for cost, he said: "Rice Creek will certainly want to contribute some fair share to solving the problem."

DNR officials plan to meet this week. "This is a situation that must be fixed," said Brad Moore, DNR deputy director.

Janette Brimmer, an attorney with the Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy, said she fears the ditch work affected many other wetlands in the area. The group is considering legal action.

Meanwhile, it's unlikely Rice Lake can be restored by hunting season.

"Hunters probably won't be able to use it this fall," Welsh said. "They're going to go there expecting to put their boats in the water, and they're going to find mud flats. There will be some angry people."
User avatar
Trois_beaux_canards
hunter
 
Posts: 2681
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 4:08 pm
Location: Minnesota


Postby duckdog » Sun Jun 26, 2005 9:40 pm

Was there any fines handed out over the deal? Going to be alot of pissed off hunter's
Any day in the outdoor's is better than at work
duckdog
hunter
 
Posts: 672
Joined: Thu Nov 25, 2004 10:42 am
Location: Ruthven Iowa

Postby Trois_beaux_canards » Sun Jun 26, 2005 10:14 pm

No fines, a gov't agency was the one who messed up.
User avatar
Trois_beaux_canards
hunter
 
Posts: 2681
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 4:08 pm
Location: Minnesota

Postby Brett Beinke » Mon Jun 27, 2005 9:56 am

Now instead of putting money toward waters that need it we are paying for govt agencys mistakes instead.
Brett Beinke
hunter
 
Posts: 28
Joined: Fri May 06, 2005 12:09 pm

Postby h2ofwlr » Mon Jun 27, 2005 1:06 pm

What in the world were Watershed Officials thinking? The watersheds all employee biologists and hydroligists who should have known the area was full of porious peat and the result would be it being drained, what a bone head mistake :pissed:

As for cost, he said: "Rice Creek will certainly want to contribute some fair share to solving the problem." Yeah like ALL of it! The DNR otherwise will want to take out duck stamp $ to fix a problem that another agency cuased! BS :pissed: The watershed district caused it--they should fix it! :yes:

I suggest that some of you write to Bremmicker and the DNR and say--the Watershed district broke it--they should have to pay for it'l restoration and not Duck stamp or other DNR $
The Audacity of Bull Crap.
"Typical: Gun-loving, bitter bible-thumping white person" Barack Obama.
Hey I resemble that comment!!! Those are FIGHTING WORDS!!!
User avatar
h2ofwlr
Forum & State Moderator
 
Posts: 3091
Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2003 10:58 am
Location: "Buzz" at 8 months . Land of 10K polluted lakes

Postby recker » Mon Jul 04, 2005 11:03 pm

Has anyone even hunted this place? I live in the cities and have never heard of it. I would believe it gets tons of pressure though.
recker
hunter
 
Posts: 420
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2004 10:52 pm
Location: Minneapolis


Return to Minnesota Duck Hunting

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests