Wasting DNRs $

In the land of 10,000 lakes, Minnesota duck hunting is some of the best. Log in and discuss your Minnesota duck hunting experiences.

Moderators: beretta24, commander019

Wasting DNRs $

Postby h2ofwlr » Thu Jul 14, 2005 11:46 am

Minnesota appealing N.D. hunting lawsuit dismissal
Dale Wetzel, Associated Press
July 13, 2005 HUNT0713

BISMARCK, N.D. -- Minnesota is appealing a judge's dismissal of a lawsuit against some North Dakota hunting regulations, and Attorney General Wayne Stenehjem hopes a ruling in another case will help sink its chances.

"I hope that Minnesota will look at whether they want to waste any further valuable resources on pursuing an appeal that is doomed,'' Stenehjem said Tuesday.

Last month, U.S. District Judge Daniel Hovland dismissed the lawsuit, which was filed by Attorney General Mike Hatch, Rep. Collin Peterson, D-Minn., and two Minnesotans who are former North Dakota residents, Starkey Grove and Charles Orvik.

Hatch argued that some North Dakota rules, which restrict when and where out-of-state hunters may go after some types of game, are unconstitutional restrictions on business between states.

Hovland concluded that Minnesota hunters come to North Dakota in "pursuit of a purely recreational activity,'' and are not engaged in interstate commerce. Michael Vanselow, a Minnesota deputy attorney general, and Harry Sieben Jr., a lawyer for Peterson, Grove and Orvik, filed the appeal last week.

Separately, the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Monday used a newly approved federal law to dismiss similar claims that Wyoming laws favoring resident hunters were unconstitutional restrictions on cross-border business.

The law, approved by Congress in May, says states may set their own hunting and fishing rules, and that hunting is not interstate commerce.

Leslie Sandberg, a spokeswoman for Hatch, said she did not believe the Monday appeals ruling would affect Minnesota's chances. Hovland, in his decision, did not use the federal law in drawing his own conclusions, she said.

Both North Dakota and Minnesota are part of the 8th Circuit, a separate federal appeals court territory. However, the new ruling could influence the 8th Circuit, Stenehjem believes.

"The 10th Circuit ruling, which is well reasoned, together with the congressional enactment, just make it pointless for Minnesota to proceed any further ... These two things just harpoon (Minnesota's) whole appeal,'' Stenehjem said Tuesday.


What a waste of MN tax $ that I bet the DNR has to pay for. :thumbsdown:
The Audacity of Bull Crap.
"Typical: Gun-loving, bitter bible-thumping white person" Barack Obama.
Hey I resemble that comment!!! Those are FIGHTING WORDS!!!
User avatar
Forum & State Moderator
Posts: 3091
Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2003 10:58 am
Location: "Buzz" at 8 months . Land of 10K polluted lakes

Postby recker » Fri Jul 15, 2005 1:31 am

It is a waste of money. The hunting has gone down hill in north dakota the last ten years because of the hunting pressure. South dakota is becoming the same way now. Why not just leave it the way it is.I would hate to see the dakota turned into carlos avery and that is what would happen.
Posts: 444
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2004 10:52 pm
Location: Minneapolis

Postby gunman » Wed Jul 20, 2005 3:48 pm

no they just keep jacking up the fricken price for us out of staters!!
My goal in life is to be as good of a person my dog already thinks I am.
Hunters are alot like Birdwatchers. Only after watching while, we start shooting!
User avatar
Posts: 975
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 10:39 pm
Location: Brainerd, MN

Return to Minnesota Duck Hunting

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 6 guests