Important: $ for prairie pothole

A forum dedicated to conservation issues and listings of conservation Orgs

Moderators: NV Guide, Dogman

Important: $ for prairie pothole

Postby macdaddy » Fri May 06, 2005 9:00 am

I found this on the Realtree site

"More Duck Stamp Dollars, Please!"

Proposal to Send More Duck Stamp Dollars
To Breeding Grounds Meets Opposition

BISMARCK, ND-A proposal to increase the percentage of duck stamp dollars going to the prairie breeding grounds has encountered resistance from other parts of the country and could be in jeopardy, sources at the US Fish and Wildlife Service say.

The proposal calls for incremental increases in the percentage of Migratory Bird Conservation Fund (MBCF) dollars going the prairie breeding grounds. The bulk of those additional dollars would be earmarked for taking perpetual wetland and grassland easements in Region 6 states North Dakota and South Dakota, which attract the bulk of the ducks nesting in the United States. The reallocation was scheduled to be phased in over three years beginning with fiscal year 2005, but Delta Waterfowl has learned the proposal now faces opposition from other regions.

"This is not a done deal," warns Bill Hartwig, assistant director of Fish and Wildlife's National Refuge System. Hartwig says reallocation ran into trouble when other regions objected to Region 6 getting a bigger piece of the pie at their expense.

Hartwig admits the reallocation "is going to be painful" for other regions, adding, "If biology drives the decision process, the Prairie Pothole Region (PPR) provides the most impact for our limited dollars. If you look at the North American Waterfowl Management Plan (NAWMP), the PPR still has the largest goals yet to achieve."

The MBCF receives revenues from the sale of the federal duck stamp, import duties on guns and ammunition, and several other sources. Between 2001 and 2004, the Region 6 Refuge Division received an average of about 27 percent of all MBCF dollars. Under the reallocation, Region 6 was increased to 32 percent this year and is scheduled to get 39 percent in 2006 and 46 percent in 2007.

Delta President Rob Olson says increasing the dollars coming to the breeding grounds is critical. "There's no question that every region in the country has pressing needs, and there many species of wildlife in need of help. But this is duck stamp money, and right now the most urgent need for ducks exists on the prairie breeding grounds."

Of prime concern is the Missouri Coteau in central South Dakota, where 10,000-year-old native prairie is being broken by farmers planting wheat and soybeans to take advantage of government farm subsidies.

On wet years, the Coteau's gently rolling hills, native grass and teeming small wetlands-as many as 100 per square mile-attract some of the highest densities of nesting ducks on the continent.

Scientists say the Coteau contains some of the best remaining breeding habitat for the beleaguered pintail, a species of concern because its population has been steadily declining for decades.

Between 2003 and 2005, Fish and Wildlife's Huron, SD realty office took 137 easements that protected over 38,000 acres, but the waiting list of landowners willing to give easements has swelled to 362 names offering 165,000 acres of prairie.

"We're taking easements as fast as we can get the money," says Harvey Wittmier, Chief of the Region 6 Division of Realty in Denver.

"Land values have soared in the Coteau," says Olson. "Native prairie that was selling for $200 an acre a few years ago is selling for $750 to $800 today. Higher land values and higher cash rents are a huge temptation to livestock producers struggling to make ends meet.

"The need to protect the Coteau is great, and the duck stamp is our best hope for getting the job done," Olson says.

Ron Reynolds of Fish & Wildlife's Habitat and Population Evaluation Team (HAPET) agrees. "Over 90 percent of the permanently protected waterfowl habitat in the PPR was secured with duck stamp dollars," Reynolds says. "It's the most efficient habitat program out there."

Reynolds says securing habitat on the breeding grounds is the best use of duck hunters' dollars because, "If we don't get the job done for duck hunters here, we're not going to get it done."

Wittmier agrees the greatest biological need for habitat protection exists on the breeding grounds. "We have extremely good data showing that 90 percent of the annual variation in the mallard population is attributable to factors in the breeding grounds."

A final decision on the allocation could be reached when the Migratory Bird Conservation Commission (MBCC) meets June 21.

"If producing more ducks is the ultimate goal, we have to follow the science and spend our dollars where they'll do the most good—the prairie breeding grounds," says Olson. "It's critical that hunters voice their support for the reallocation proposal."

Olson says hunters can register their support by visiting Delta Waterfowl's website. "A lot of hunters have told us how disappointed they were by low duck numbers in recent years," he says. "This is their chance to do something about it."

Seems important, so I posted it. What do youns think?
Last edited by macdaddy on Mon May 09, 2005 9:11 am, edited 1 time in total.
I'm the guy your Mother Goose warned you about.
macdaddy
hunter
 
Posts: 835
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 10:18 am
Location: Mercer/Lawrence Co's. W. Pa


Postby Admin2 » Fri May 06, 2005 9:36 am

Considering that the ducks raised in the PPR of the US migrate to 3 of the 4 flyways, I think it is very short sighted not to spend the bulk of the $ there in my personal opinion.


The Deputy riding shotgun
User avatar
Admin2
hunter
 
Posts: 3674
Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2004 7:52 pm
Location: lurking around the corner keeping an eye out for trouble makers

Postby Dogman » Sat May 07, 2005 6:29 pm

Here's a chance to get it done now rather than wait till later and b#%@^ about how come something wasn't done.
No one is making anymore land so what we have now is all there is,sounds like buying up as much of the remaining prairie pot hole region is a good investment.

This type of thing is all the more reason for us as Duck hunters to get involved with orgs that work to insure we will have fall flights now and well after were gone. :thumbsup:
My lab is still the best hunting partner there is.
User avatar
Dogman
Forum & State Moderator
 
Posts: 1416
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2003 4:44 pm
Location: Southern Maine

Postby macdaddy » Mon May 09, 2005 9:18 am

I'm glad to see the response. I know that I've posted before that the key to conservation is buying the land. This money from the duck stamp is our money. We're footing the bill. I'm also going to get after my senators & congressmen over this. Right, admin2 - the money has to go where it's needed most.
I'm the guy your Mother Goose warned you about.
macdaddy
hunter
 
Posts: 835
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 10:18 am
Location: Mercer/Lawrence Co's. W. Pa

Postby Quackcephus » Mon May 09, 2005 7:18 pm

That's also why ya'll should participate in the "Adopt A Pothole" program that Delta sponsor's. Several of us contirbute as a group down my way every year. :thumbsup:
Quackcephus
hunter
 
Posts: 940
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 12:59 am

Postby duckdog » Fri Jun 17, 2005 9:17 pm

I live in NW Iowa , very close to South Dakota, and here it is amazing how much land get's tilled up for farm ground. Now I am not putting anything against farmer's at all, we need them also. I work in construction, and every year there is more, and more ground getting tiled out for farming. Thankfully where I live there is an abundance of public ground also. Ever since the CRP program only cover's highly erodible ground now, the duck population has went downhill here, these duck come back to the Dakota's, and Canada every spring to nest, that's where the main focus need's to be looked at, I would love to see more money spent in Iowa for ground, but the real problem is not here. we need to put the support, to the source IMO. More nesting ground more duck's BOTTOM LINE!!! IMHO
Any day in the outdoor's is better than at work
duckdog
hunter
 
Posts: 672
Joined: Thu Nov 25, 2004 10:42 am
Location: Ruthven Iowa


Return to Conservation/Biology

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest