Buck pics 07-05-09

Deer, Elk, Moose, Bear, Hog

Moderators: stumpjumper, don taylor

Buck pics 07-05-09

Postby cnggack » Sun Jul 05, 2009 10:31 am

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image
User avatar
cnggack
hunter
 
Posts: 469
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 10:29 pm
Location: SW Minnesota ,Tyler


Re: Buck pics 07-05-09

Postby berettaguy17 » Sun Jul 05, 2009 3:57 pm

the second one looks like he will have a lot of mass
Why not shoot all 3 shots, they make more shells everyday.
berettaguy17
hunter
 
Posts: 653
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 10:35 pm
Location: ottawa, illinois

Re: Buck pics 07-05-09

Postby cjg » Sun Jul 05, 2009 7:02 pm

Cool pics :thumbsup:
User avatar
cjg
hunter
 
Posts: 977
Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2008 1:46 am
Location: North Waterboro, Maine

Re: Buck pics 07-05-09

Postby don taylor » Mon Jul 13, 2009 8:23 pm

I bought a trail cam back when the were big bucks and 2.0 was a lot of pixels. What camera is that and what are the pros and cons in your opinion?

Nice pics.
BIGGER WATER DECOYS

Chairman- The Allegheny Chapter of Delta Waterfowl.

https://www.facebook.com/groups/4277478 ... 6859634909
User avatar
don taylor
Forum & State Moderator
 
Posts: 7534
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 7:38 pm
Location: Westmoreland County, Pa.

Re: Buck pics 07-05-09

Postby cnggack » Tue Jul 14, 2009 11:27 am

don taylor wrote:I bought a trail cam back when the were big bucks and 2.0 was a lot of pixels. What camera is that and what are the pros and cons in your opinion?

Nice pics.


Thanks , This was a home made sony P41 With snapshot sniper board. The home made trail cams will get better pics for around $250-$300 If you just want to know whats out there some of the cheaper manufactured cam will work. I am after good quality pics and use them year round.
User avatar
cnggack
hunter
 
Posts: 469
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 10:29 pm
Location: SW Minnesota ,Tyler

Re: Buck pics 07-05-09

Postby GroundSwatter » Thu Jul 16, 2009 10:19 am

http://www.chasingame.com/index.php?id=2

This website does comprehensive reviews on many popular trail cameras. I have the Moultrie i40 with the IR flash and its a descent camera for the money. Its only 4 megapixel, but I think 4 is plenty for most game cameras, and 6 is a bit overkill.

There are other custom jobs that get better pic's I'm sure, but if you are just trying to keep tabs on game, most of them will work fine. I prefer the IR flash, even though a normal flash gets better pictures, b/c people are less likely to spot it going off at night from the road.
It's a fact that 70 percent of the people who purchase heavier tackle do so with the categorical I just lost a huge snook! Einstein Hairdo.The other 30 percent have either Tarpon Fever or are sporting a hand cramped into a claw from a deepwater grouper.
User avatar
GroundSwatter
hunter
 
Posts: 3641
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 3:22 pm
Location: GTMO from NE Texas


Return to Big Game

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests