Looking at purchasing my first centerfire this summer, have it narrowed down to 4 calibers. The gun will primarily be used for MI whitetails and possibly black bear, but I can see it being used for hunts out west in the future (mulies, anelope, possibly elk, and I would like to be able to use it for varmints too if possible). Most likely a 4-12x or so will sit atop. I'm looking at Browning X-Bolts, A-Bolts, Tikka's, Savage's and Remington 700s. Whichever I get I will be reloading.
.270 Winchester - everything I have read says this is enough to take down an elk with the right bullet, ammo is pretty common (relatively speaking anyways), not sure about long range accuracy and capability to take down deer-sized game or larger at long distance (400 yards+)
.308 Winchester - also very common, enough to take down anything listed, endless bullet possibilities, decent at long range
30-06 Springfield - most common deer caliber out there, ammo available everywhere (you know what I mean), good at long range, lots of bullet options for reloader, but recoil is a bit stouter than .308 & .270
300 Win-mag - obviously most stout recoil and greatest ability to take down large game, but also probably the best at long range. Might be a bit overkill for varmints but again, lots of bullet choices for this caliber as well.
I have a .270 and love it. It has more than enough power to take down a deer. It is also my go to gun for hogs, I usually line two up and have always been able to take them both down (unless it was my fault). My uncle has shot a few elk with his and said it worked great, but he always used ammunition that he reloaded which you said you would be doing. My buddy has a 300wsm and that thing blows away the deer, although it would be better for elk. Another caliber you should think about is the .270 wsm, although I am not sure about availability. I have connected on a few coyotes at about 400, and the .270 is very capable at that range. It would have more to do with wind and other variables considering the guns you listed.
the caliber i would go with is 30-06. have a weatherby vanguard in that caliber and love it. shooot 165gr. hornday sst factory ammo out of it a get 2/3" groups at 100 yds.
I have a .270 and love it. It has more than enough power to take down a deer. It is also my go to gun for hogs, I usually line two up and have always been able to take them both down (unless it was my fault). My uncle has shot a few elk with his and said it worked great, but he always used ammunition that he reloaded which you said you would be doing. My buddy has a 300wsm and that thing blows away the deer, although it would be better for elk. Another caliber you should think about is the .270 wsm, although I am not sure about availability. I have connected on a few coyotes at about 400, and the .270 is very capable at that range. It would have more to do with wind and other variables considering the guns you listed.
I might be wrong, but you might want to check some ballistic tables because I think the 30 06 drops considerably between 200 and 300 yards then after 300 drops sharply to 400.
A .270 to me is a necked down .30-06. If you're going to get the .270 you might as well get the .30-06 for the bigger bullet IMO. I'm partial to .308's myself because I want something that I can enjoy shooting at the range instead of cringing and will take down an elk. If you get the .30-06 I wouldn't get a syntheic stock unless you like pain :thumbsup:
I might be wrong, but you might want to check some ballistic tables because I think the 30 06 drops considerably between 200 and 300 yards then after 300 drops sharply to 400.
drop happens with all ammo in any caliber. if you plan on doing much shooting past 200 yds, you much pratice at farther ranges and know how you gun preforms.
Well I looked it up and it looks like the difference is only about 3" at 400. I may have been thinking of the 30-30, good luck with whatever you choose!
A .270 to me is a necked down .30-06. If you're going to get the .270 you might as well get the .30-06 for the bigger bullet IMO. I'm partial to .308's myself because I want something that I can enjoy shooting at the range instead of cringing and will take down an elk. If you get the .30-06 I wouldn't get a syntheic stock unless you like pain :thumbsup:
What do you guys think of the 7mm-08? I posted this on another forum and quite a few people have recommended it. Based on what I've heard the .300 and .270 are out. It's really between the -06, .308 and 7mm-08 now but I'm considering the last two more than the -06. I don't think I could spend a day a the range with an -06, the other two I probably could. In terms of taking game at a distance, both the .308 and 7mm-08 should do fine out to 300 yards on deer.
What do you guys think of the 7mm-08? I posted this on another forum and quite a few people have recommended it. Based on what I've heard the .300 and .270 are out. It's really between the -06, .308 and 7mm-08 now but I'm considering the last two more than the -06. I don't think I could spend a day a the range with an -06, the other two I probably could. In terms of taking game at a distance, both the .308 and 7mm-08 should do fine out to 300 yards on deer.
What do you guys think of the 7mm-08? I posted this on another forum and quite a few people have recommended it. Based on what I've heard the .300 and .270 are out. It's really between the -06, .308 and 7mm-08 now but I'm considering the last two more than the -06. I don't think I could spend a day a the range with an -06, the other two I probably could. In terms of taking game at a distance, both the .308 and 7mm-08 should do fine out to 300 yards on deer.
Yeah, was looking at the ballistics for both....really not much difference and there are a ton of bullet options available for both as well. Some other guys I talked to convinced me that you can't really have one gun for everything. Since this gun will see 99% of its use in MI for whitetails, coyotes and possibly bear I think both the 308 and 7mm-08 will handle as far of shot as you can get in MI. A trip out west probably won't happen for a few years yet, until I'm graduated at least, and by that time hopefully I will be able to afford another gun specifically for hunting out there.
.308 or 7mm-08 will handle anything out west except maybe a grizz. I would get either one of those put GOOD glass on it and shoot the crap out of it. Practice makes perfect.
.308 or 7mm-08 will handle anything out west except maybe a grizz. I would get either one of those put GOOD glass on it and shoot the crap out of it. Practice makes perfect.
Leaning towards the 7mm-08 right now. It's a little flatter shooting and has just a touch less recoil. Since there are tons of bullet choices for both the 7mm and 308 reloading either makes perfect sense. As for glass, it won't be a Zeiss but I'll likely pony up the money for at least a VX-II or Bushnell Elite, probably a VX-III if I can afford it (remember I'm still in college :biggrin: )
You could look for a used vx-3 leupy stands behind there stuff so if anything would go wrong they fix it no questions asked. I have heard good things about the bushnell 4200 dont know how much they are though.
swift premiere are also great scopes for under $200. have a 4x12 on my 30-06 and a 3x9 on my muzzleloader. both scopes have over a hundred rounds through them and have worked flawlessly.
Since this gun will see 99% of its use in MI for whitetails, coyotes and possibly bear I think both the 308 and 7mm-08 will handle as far of shot as you can get in MI.
Partially based on what preach said, I would go with the 30-06 and the .308. 30-06, you can find ammo almost anywhere and its one of the most versatile rounds out there. To me the recoil isn't all that bad, but I guess recoil is in the shoulder of the shooter.
Are you a smaller framed shooter? My 30-.06 (Ruger Mk. II) doesn't kick much at all. I would say in all honesty that a 3 inch waterfowl or turkey load kicks about the same (from Mossberg 835 and SBEII) as the .06. Now you want recoil? Check out the "T-rex video on youtube.
Are you a smaller framed shooter? My 30-.06 (Ruger Mk. II) doesn't kick much at all. I would say in all honesty that a 3 inch waterfowl or turkey load kicks about the same (from Mossberg 835 and SBEII) as the .06. Now you want recoil? Check out the "T-rex video on youtube.
Got a few pounds on ya but never really considered my .06 to have that bad of recoil. I'd much rather sight that in than my old mans .338 or my bro's .300. I also like the .o6 because of the vast range of bullets you can shoot from it. Found some Remington reduced recoil (managed recoil) rounds for coyotes and they don't kick hardly at all.
My synthetic stock Remington 700 in '06 doesn't kick that bad to me either. To each his own though, but I'm definitely with jrode when he said 3" duck loads out of an 835 kick worse.
Leaning towards the .270 now. Wasn't really giving it much consideration before but I think I really underestimated it. If I can find one for a decent price I think I'm going to pick up a Remington CDL SF
.270 is a fine round that has killed many deer, much like all the rounds we have discussed. As DevilDog said earlier, it is just a necked down 30-06, so I might still consider the .30-06 over .270. .30-06 would also give you more flexibility, i.e. off the shelf ammo with bullets in 150gr up to 220gr.
But again, .270 is a fine round.
As for optics. I think Nikon Optics are are great for the price.
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Related Threads
?
?
?
?
?
Duck Hunting Forum
3.2M posts
63.3K members
Since 2000
A forum community dedicated to duck hunters and hunting enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about safety, gear, tips, tricks, optics, hunting, gunsmithing, reviews, reports, accessories, classifieds, and more!