The Waterfowler wrote:
QuackAddict95 wrote: What do you guys think?
Your last sentence asks a very honest and pointed question and you got answers. If you think you may not like the answer, don't ask the question. All of us on here try to get along and give honest answers. You may not like them, but name calling is no way to get respect on this forum IMO.
Thanks Pat. You make a good point.
I have to admit when I read the title to the thread I thought it was going to be a "one of a kind mount" as well. I figured I must have misunderstood what the title actually meant after seeing what the mount actually was? Either way, I can't agree more with the name calling comment either. I think you just as easily could have said: LOL instead of hey smart ass? I think the comment was valid about it not being a one of a kind mount, even if your title meant something else? If your title was meant to read exactly that…."One of a kind", then I feel your mount is only one of a kind in respect that it is not exactly like other dead mounts that have already been done, but certainly has been done thousands of times. I hope this ends now?