dudejcb wrote:it's amazing you guys cannot tell the difference between a guy with brains who actually worked his ay to where he is, and a woman who once was asportscaster and a Miss Alaska runner up.
so since she was a sportscaster and in miss alaska, she is nothing and hasnt done anything of merit in her life before or since??? ---the liberal mind with blinders firmly attached.
you just cant stand that the republicans nailed this one? or what? why are you so quick to bash her? its just party politics... it wouldnt matter who mccain picked, you would imediately take issue with them because they are dirty republicans... she is a great pick for VP. with 4 years under her belt in the VP spot, she will probably make a great pres!! she cannot do anything about abortion because of precedent and a liberal congress (if they can hold their seats).
she is great for guns, hunting, taxes, energy, relations with russia, and freedoms in general. a reagan republican. even many democrats loved reagan. he was an actor tho, so does that mean that we was worthless and made no great accomplishments in his life either?
we have all said for years that we need a regular joe to get in office. someone without all the baggage of washington, who has the common sense of a normal up-bringing to lead the country instead of seeking office just for all the hand-outs, and money. this woman is as close as it gets without actually picking some random dude or chic off the street somewhere. she has done great things in alaska in a very short time, and im honestly looking forward to each and every speech she will give. im certain she will bring some sense to the decision making process. a trait that we severly lack in washington (and most everywhere else it seems)