Duck Hunting Forum banner

Experience with duck hunting using a red dot sight

2 reading
7.2K views 26 replies 18 participants last post by  Indaswamp  
#1 ·
I have a great deal on a Burris speed bead for an A400. I was looking to hear real experiences with these red dot sights for duck hunting. I don't want the you don't need a red dot to shot ducks. I shot great without one, but I've always wanted to try one out. I've heard positive and negatives, but most the negatives just say its stupid with no prior experience. What are the personal experiences from hunters on here?
 
#23 ·
JuniorPre 360 said:
Couple great guys who'd hunted with me and seen my battered, '90s vintage little Montefeltro 20 blessed me with a new one I initially couldn't hit pecans with, despite printing essentially the same when tested. Can't help but think the difference is that the front optical beads have been long gone from both my old 20 and the equally aged SBE I use for geese, and the one on the new 20 presents more distraction than aid to my shooting.

And I'm inclined to think that the case for many fooling with even more prominent beads. If the gun fits as it should, one's focus should be downrange. YMMV.
 
#24 ·
Rick Hall said:
JuniorPre 360 said:
Couple great guys who'd hunted with me and seen my battered, '90s vintage little Montefeltro 20 blessed me with a new one I initially couldn't hit pecans with, despite printing essentially the same when tested. Can't help but think the difference is that the front optical beads have been long gone from both my old 20 and the equally aged SBE I use for geese, and the one on the new 20 presents more distraction than aid to my shooting.

And I'm inclined to think that the case for many fooling with even more prominent beads. If the gun fits as it should, one's focus should be downrange. YMMV.
Agree with that. I don't like fiber optics, red dots, etc. If you aren't hitting ducks, I think you are over analyzing the shot and focusing too much on your sights. Spend more time and the clay range and work on maintaining consistent cheek placement and watching down range at the bird vice the sight.
 
#25 ·
Bluesky2012 said:
Rick Hall said:
JuniorPre 360 said:
Couple great guys who'd hunted with me and seen my battered, '90s vintage little Montefeltro 20 blessed me with a new one I initially couldn't hit pecans with, despite printing essentially the same when tested. Can't help but think the difference is that the front optical beads have been long gone from both my old 20 and the equally aged SBE I use for geese, and the one on the new 20 presents more distraction than aid to my shooting.

And I'm inclined to think that the case for many fooling with even more prominent beads. If the gun fits as it should, one's focus should be downrange. YMMV.
Agree with that. I don't like fiber optics, red dots, etc. If you aren't hitting ducks, I think you are over analyzing the shot and focusing too much on your sights. Spend more time and the clay range and work on maintaining consistent cheek placement and watching down range at the bird vice the sight.
I agree. They're not for everybody and it comes down to how good of a shot you are. But I'm looking at an experience I had with my old Mossberg. Had a gray bead at the end. Once I stuck this red and yellow fiber optic sight on, I felt like I took better shots at ducks. It could be my somewhat poor eyesight as well and having a glowing bead helped out. My new M3500 has a more dull red optic sight, and I like it.