Duck Hunting Forum banner
1 - 2 of 2 Posts

3,091 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Posted on Sun, Jul. 11, 2004

Goose season will be cut back Poor breeding affects Lac qui Parle zone


Pioneer Press

A popular goose-hunting season in western Minnesota will be scaled back because of a poor breeding season by Canada geese in the Canadian Arctic.

Minnesota waterfowl biologists are discussing reducing the season or refiguring hunting zones for the goose hunt at the Lac qui Parle Goose Zone after reports that the Eastern Prairie Population of Canada geese had the worst breeding season since 1976, when record-keeping began.

A late spring on Hudson Bay is to blame. Biologists monitoring the geese at Cape Churchill on the bay describe the goose breeding season as a "complete bust.'' They worry that the flock, which can number between 200,000 and 300,000, could be nearly devoid of young geese this fall.

That's bad news for goose hunters in western Minnesota. The EPP geese migrate through western Minnesota and use Lac qui Parle Wildlife Management Area and surrounding areas as a major resting spot before continuing to their winter grounds in Missouri.

Steve Cordts, a Department of Natural Resources waterfowl specialist, said the state will have to cut its harvest of EPP geese by 25 percent.

The Lac qui Parle Goose Zone had a 40-day season year, but that likely will be cut back. It's also possible the Lac qui Parle zone and perhaps surrounding hunting zones might be redrawn to reduce the goose kill.

"We can't reduce the bag limit because it's only one,'' said Cordts. "We'll have some sort of restricted season and maybe do something with zones."

This week, DNR waterfowl officials will meet to consider options at Lac qui Parle.

They're also preparing for a weeklong series of meetings starting July 20 when Duluth hosts the annual Mississippi Flyway Council meetings. Between 60 and 70 waterfowl biologists and conservationists from 14 states, three Canadian provinces and several conservation groups will attend the meeting.

The council, along with its advisory committees, helps determine waterfowl policies for the Mississippi Flyway, a corridor of waterfowl migration that begins in Canada and roughly follows the Mississippi River to the Gulf of Mexico. The flyway includes Minnesota and Louisiana and 12 states in between.

The council makes recommendations for season lengths, bag limits and other policies at the meeting and forwards those proposals to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, which makes final decisions on regulations in August.

The status of the EPP geese will be discussed at the Mississippi Flyway meeting, along with means of reducing their harvest.

The top issues, however, concern this year's duck regulations. There is increasing concern about North America's breeding duck population and the effects of drought conditions in prairie Canada. Though many parts of North America received late spring rains, as Minnesota did, biologists are wondering aloud if the rain came too late to affect populations.

Some species, such as scaup and pintails, are experiencing long-term declines. Some waterfowl hunters and policymakers have criticized the federal Adaptive Harvest Management program, a formula that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service utilizes to set regulations. Some critics say the formula doesn't respond to fluctuating population levels and doesn't adequately protect waterfowl when they need it.

The controversial spinning-wing decoys remain a hot issue for waterfowl biologists, who are hearing more calls for greater restrictions on the decoys.

Also, a group of Minnesota duck hunters and retired biologists calling themselves the Concerned Duck Hunters Panel hope to make a presentation to the group. The group, led by Duluth's Dave Zentner, is concerned about the overharvest of ducks by hunters.

Cordts said biologists are still waiting for results of the spring waterfowl surveys in Canada and the upper Midwest. "I hate to come out with predictions because I could be wrong,'' he said, regarding bag limits and season lengths. "I put a lot of weight on those May surveys. If breeding populations are high, I think we could justify a liberal duck season."

15 Posts
I remember when the seasons jumped to the 60 days/6 ducks (50 days/5 ducks). I still hold the same response today that I had back then. I want a long season, but cut back on the daily/possession limit when needed. I began seriously duck hunting during the 80's...back when we had a 3 bird limit. Newbies to the sport would balk at such low limits...and yes, that is a lot of work for a couple of breasts. But to me, the experience is what counts. I am one of those that has a successful hunt even if I shoot 1 bird, but at least I am out hunting. I also hunt until the last minute of the season.
To those that argue that keeping the season long will still result in high harvest numbers, that is not the case. 39% of all ducks harvested in MN are shot on the first weekend (keep in mind, that is 1.5 days). Then it rapidly drops off! The majority of licensed duck hunters hunt a couple of weekends (at best), tote about there waterfowling prowess, and then head off pheasant, or just plain wait til deer hunting. (This being another reason why I am OK with the noon opener, and why I really like the 4pm closing). So if reform is in order, let's cut back on limits, but not on our ability to hunt.
And if we want to keep going (since I am on the soapbox), MN should have a northern season and a southern season. I know of too many people in the northern tier that are done by early Nov. and never see the likes of a blue wing teal in their bag.
(slow day at work and this seems to be more fun...)
1 - 2 of 2 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.