Does anyone have an idea of why California doesn't allow us to hunt swans where I hunt their are thousands and I've heard they are pretty good to eat for old timerd
Only if you shoot them I the valley where they've been eating rice. Swans in the bay are just big stinkNoobhunter said:I bet they are tastier than spoonies
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
:lol3: :lol3:spoonysmaker said:Knowing you I'm sure you have tried them first hand. :fingerpt:
And they can shot ful auto 30 rd mag in some states.delta85c said:If they allowed you to shoot seagulls in other states wouldn't you wonder why they don't allow you to in California?
I mean come on. You are questioning hunting laws in ca. That should explain it all. They probably think they are pretty and don't want us to shoot them.delta85c said:No reason to b a **** im just curious!
I don't know. There are thousands where I hunt. :sarcmark:friedcoot said:Gulls keep our schools clean. Why would you want to shoot the garbage collector anyway ?
There are lots of bald eagles where I hunt. :fingerpt:mendotakiller said:Why can't we hunt Sandhills here eitheror barn owls!?!? Or eagles!!!
You can. You just have to pay the consequences if you get caught. How deep is your wallet? I bet they taste just as good as spoonie if you marinate them in a sugar base long enough.mendotakiller said:Why can't we hunt Sandhills here eitheror barn owls!?!? Or eagles!!!
. Excellent post! It is great to get a bunch of cool information on this site. Thanks.JRS said:"The American Ornithologist's Union (1982) changed the common name of this species
from whistling swan to tundra swan. North American tundra swans are delineated into
two populations, based upon their largely separate breeding and wintering distributions
(Figure 1). The Western Population breeds in western and northwestern Alaska and
winters in the western United States and coastal British Columbia. The Eastern
Population breeds from northern Alaska across the Canadian Arctic and winters on the
Atlantic coast.
The number of WP swans recorded on the Pacific Flyway Midwinter Waterfowl Surveys
has averaged about 55,300 birds over the long term (1949-2000) and 80,600 over the
past 10 years (Appendix A). WP winter indices doubled during the 1950s, increased by
50% in the 1970s and 1980s, and began a steady significant increase in the 1990s
(Figure 2). The population reached an all-time high of 122,521 swans in 1997 and
nearly as many in 1999 (Appendix A). Historically, EP swans have been more
numerous than WP swans, and began to increase significantly in the mid-1970s. The
EP grew by 55% between the mid-1950s and the late 1990s and peaked at over
110,000 in 1992. Since then the EP has averaged about 90,000 swans and seems
relatively stable or gradually declining. Overall, the combined number of EP and WP
swans increased at an average annual rate of about 2.1% during the period 1955-89
(
Serie and Bartonek 1991) and now comprise a record number of over 210,000 tundra
swans in North America."
http://pacificflyway.gov/documents/wts_plan.pdf
ADDITIONALLY, BEAR IN MIND THERE ARE FERAL MUTE SWANS AT LARGE IN CA![]()
BINGO!! we have a winner!Sgtstadanko707 said:I mean come on. You are questioning hunting laws in ca. That should explain it all. They probably think they are pretty and don't want us to shoot them.delta85c said:No reason to b a **** im just curious!