Ten years ago, middle-of-the-week hunts at Cheyenne Bottoms (my home WMA) were noticeably less pressured than weekends. But, no more.
Since about 2018, every day of the week is heavily pressured. The main reason for this is that 75%-90% of the hunters on the major areas are from out of state (OOS). These hunters come to Kansas areas for five or ten day stays, and for them every day of those 5 or 10 days is a hunt day regardless of what day of the week it is, and they will be on the marsh every morning until they have to return to their home state.
I would not want to see the state artificially limit hunters, either by lottery draws, tighter restrictions on OOS hunters, or by only allowing certain days or certain hours of the day on which we can hunt. I want to continue to see freedom, for resident hunters and non-resident hunters alike, to hunt when and where they want.
For this and several other reasons, I think the best way to reduce the number of hunters on public (and private, as well) lands is for the state of Kansas to reduce the daily bag limit (DBL) of 6 ducks/6 Canada geese to 3/3. If this were to happen, OOS hunters would look at Kansas, then at neighboring states, and decide for themselves....to a large part....to go to another state where the DBL is six or seven. They, of course, could decide to come here to hunt, but Kansas would look a lot less attractive as compared to other waterfowl hunting destinations.
There will be plenty of hunters....mostly resident hunters....who will complain that they shouldn't have to give up anything to reduce hunter pressure. They will oppose this measure. But, any measure taken by KDWP to reduce hunter pressure will affect every one of us in one way or another. If giving up the possibility of an additional three ducks a day is the ONLY thing we'll be giving up, then I say that's a small price to pay to gain back the quality of our Kansas waterfowl hunting.
After all, is the quality of our hunt based soley on the number of ducks we bring out of the marsh, or is it based on other, more intangible, components? Limit hunts are mighty attractive, but a limit is a limit, regardless of the number attached to that limit.