I have been thinking of a 5/8oz #8 TSS - 5/8oz #1 Steel load for an all purpose 1 1/4oz 3'' 12gauge duck and goose load
my thought being that with aprox 160 #8's in 5/8 oz and aprox 63 #1's in 5/8 oz for a total pellet count of aprox 223.
that's the equivalent pellet count/pattern density of a 1 1/4oz #4 steel Shotshell (which seems to have great pattern density at the ranges I shoot, just lacks in pellet energy and penetration at those ranges.) so with every pellet delivering as much penetration as a #1 or more. in fact 72% of the pay load is #8 tss which penetrates better then #1 steel, I think it would be a hammer.
my only concern is the ballistics characteristics of the #8 tss not matching up very well with that of the #1 steel. and potentially causing a longer then normal shot string.
I have seen hawglips in a old post compare the energy and penetration depth of #9 tss and BB steel in a duplex load as fairly similar.
"at 40 yards
Steel BB
72/oz, 758 fps final velocity, 305.4 ft-lbs/sq in, 2.35" gel penetration
TSS 9s (smaller than standard - the ones they were shooting above)
391/oz, 749 fps final velocity, 290.4 ft-lbs/sq in, 2.24" gel penetration
TSS 9s (standard size)
360/oz, 765 fps final velocity, 315 ft-lbs/sq in, 2.42" gel penetration" (copied from a hawglips post on this site)
I am unsure if that would equate to fairly similar ballistic characteristics between the #9 tss and BB steel as well or not. but if that was the case it would lead me to think I might be better of with a #9 tss / #1 or BB steel duplex load. I just have a hard time wrapping my head around how small the #9s are.
or is the different density's between tss and steel not able to be compensated for by miss matching shot sizes to achieve similar ballistic characteristics and a normal length shot string? do the 2 metals just separate from each other down range no matter the miss matching of shot sizes to compensate for this?
anyways I'm looking for input, suggestions, opinions and all that junk. let me have it
my thought being that with aprox 160 #8's in 5/8 oz and aprox 63 #1's in 5/8 oz for a total pellet count of aprox 223.
that's the equivalent pellet count/pattern density of a 1 1/4oz #4 steel Shotshell (which seems to have great pattern density at the ranges I shoot, just lacks in pellet energy and penetration at those ranges.) so with every pellet delivering as much penetration as a #1 or more. in fact 72% of the pay load is #8 tss which penetrates better then #1 steel, I think it would be a hammer.
my only concern is the ballistics characteristics of the #8 tss not matching up very well with that of the #1 steel. and potentially causing a longer then normal shot string.
I have seen hawglips in a old post compare the energy and penetration depth of #9 tss and BB steel in a duplex load as fairly similar.
"at 40 yards
Steel BB
72/oz, 758 fps final velocity, 305.4 ft-lbs/sq in, 2.35" gel penetration
TSS 9s (smaller than standard - the ones they were shooting above)
391/oz, 749 fps final velocity, 290.4 ft-lbs/sq in, 2.24" gel penetration
TSS 9s (standard size)
360/oz, 765 fps final velocity, 315 ft-lbs/sq in, 2.42" gel penetration" (copied from a hawglips post on this site)
I am unsure if that would equate to fairly similar ballistic characteristics between the #9 tss and BB steel as well or not. but if that was the case it would lead me to think I might be better of with a #9 tss / #1 or BB steel duplex load. I just have a hard time wrapping my head around how small the #9s are.
or is the different density's between tss and steel not able to be compensated for by miss matching shot sizes to achieve similar ballistic characteristics and a normal length shot string? do the 2 metals just separate from each other down range no matter the miss matching of shot sizes to compensate for this?
anyways I'm looking for input, suggestions, opinions and all that junk. let me have it