I know there is an issue with one of the vaccines. If not there is some healthcare workers faking it to get some time off.
There is some sort of criteria for length for time for a person to be exposed to a positive covid personHNTFSH said:
My neighbors son was bitten by a lone star tick. He now has alpha gal disease. From what Al has told me you don't want that crap either.HNTFSH said::lol3: :lol3: :lol3: :clapping:SpinnerMan said:For me it's ticks. Freak me out. I picked one up in one of my favorite archery spots last season. I don't think I will ever be able to hunt there again. Not like pretty much everywhere else I hunt doesn't have the same risk, but that spot, I'll feel them crawling on me. "nope, not doing it."
I'm more in the camp of the vaccine was being developed alongside the lab creation of the actual virus.SpinnerMan said:There has been huge advancement in medical technology and we have known how to mass produce vaccines for a long time. It should not have taken so long in hindsight. Hopefully even faster next time.cartervj said:I want to know about the rumors that the reason the vaccines happened so quickly was because they were already in development.
So asymptotic transmission happens at what rate.BigTerp said:Once again......where did the extra 400,000 American deaths come from last year? A question that's been asked over and over here, with not even a sniff of an answer, or theory......nothing. You want to refute the numbers of deaths from Covid, fair enough. But you've got to then be able to explain or, at least, theorize why there were hundreds of thousands of extra deaths in the past year.Indaswamp said:Once again...I dispute those number of deaths FROM Covid...
So, are ALL the scientist, doctors, epidemiologists, etc., etc. who have been studying this stuff for decades and Covid pretty intensely for the past year, be part of the grand scheme to present falsified data? If so, to what ends? What other science do you deny? Seriously. Below is just an example of one of those studies from Duke University. They must be in on the conspiracy as well.Indaswamp said:Asymptomatic spread of infection is a lie.
"Nearly 40% of children ages 6 to 13 tested positive for COVID-19, but were asymptomatic, according to just published research from the Duke University BRAVE Kids study. While the children had no symptoms of COVID-19, they had the same viral load of SARS-CoV-2 in their nasal areas, meaning that asymptomatic children had the same capacity to spread the virus compared to others who had symptoms of COVID-19."
You say things like the above. Provide you're sources, provide your data, SHOW YOUR WORK. You can't just deny this or state that with literally nothing to back it up.
Like Spinner said earlier, some people are SO entrenched in their beliefs that they are blind to REAL facts and data. It's astonishing, really.
It has been a magical few days.Rat Creek said:You have to follow the science,,, er,,,, I mean the political science. That's it,,, the political science is settled. :hammer:HNTFSH said:What do ya do when you are supposed to be the expert but you have no clue about how to fix the problem?
You make stuff up. I think that transcends political affiliation. :lol3:
I take it you're a DoctorBigTerp said:Now, don't get me wrong, there was a LOT of fear mongering and terribly mixed messages along the way. It's being frustrating and the public lost a lot of trust in the CDC and government in general because of it. The most recent example is Walensky's impassioned speech about her fear of impending doom back in March and just 2 days ago she wasn't comfortable sending her kid to camp (why by the way? Science would deem that is safe). Next day- goodbye masks. It's such a mixed bag of messaging and a terrible look. Give me science, numbers, and data, not your own personal worries, thanks.
Your point is real when applied to suicides especially among school age children. Parents were very much concerned with their kids.Indaswamp said:Under reporting of total deaths, not deaths due to contracting Covid. How many of the deaths recorded as Covid deaths should be moved to the total death column due to the lock down? That is the real tragedy....the toll of death from the lockdown is something that does not fit the narrative, so it is not reported. The lockdown is responsible for more deaths than those from contracting Covid. It's downright criminal. And bad information is what drove the lockdowns. I was against it from the start and it pisses me off even more now that the real data is becoming available.Your link reports a huge UNDER reporting.